Protecting Your Children Isn't Divisive: When Distance from Family Is the Healthiest Choice

banner image

As a family therapist, I've witnessed a profound shift in my practice over the past year. More families are grappling with a question that once seemed unthinkable: is it okay to end relationships with family members over political differences? The answer, particularly when those differences threaten the safety and dignity of your children, may surprise you. Sometimes, stepping away isn't just acceptable—it's an act of healthy boundary-setting and protective parenting.

I'm thinking specifically of families where parents of LGBTQ+, Black, or Latino children have reached out to Trump-voting relatives to discuss their concerns, only to be met with silence. This isn't about disagreement over tax policy or infrastructure spending. When family members cast votes for policies and rhetoric that directly target your children's rights, safety, and humanity, and then refuse to even engage in conversation about it, they're making a choice. That choice tells you something important: their political allegiance supersedes their relationship with you and your children. As painful as this realization is, ignoring it doesn't protect anyone—it only teaches your children that they must shrink themselves to maintain relationships with people who won't advocate for them.

The refusal to engage is particularly telling. When someone won't even have a conversation, they're essentially saying the relationship isn't worth the discomfort of examination. We therapists often talk about "repair" in relationships, but repair requires two willing participants. If you've extended your hand and been ignored, you've done your part. The guilt many people feel about setting boundaries with family often stems from the cultural narrative that "family is everything" and we must forgive unconditionally. But unconditional love shouldn't mean unconditional access. Your first responsibility is to your children and to modeling for them that their dignity is non-negotiable, even when that means disappointing relatives who once babysat them or sent birthday cards.

Ending or significantly limiting these relationships isn't about punishment or revenge—it's about psychological safety and integrity. Children absorb everything, including the message sent when parents maintain close relationships with people who support policies that harm them. Your queer child notices when you still go to Thanksgiving at Uncle Phil's house even though he dismisses their identity. Your Latino son internalizes what it means when you make excuses for relatives who support mass deportation policies. By choosing distance, you're teaching your children that their worth isn't up for debate, that love requires action not just words, and that it's okay to protect your peace. Some family members may eventually do their own work and reach out authentically. Others won't. Either way, you'll have modeled something essential: that sometimes the most loving thing we can do is walk away.